Sunday, October 1, 2017

The History of Indian Boarding Schools


Total control of the Indian children’s education was viewed as the most feasible option to achieve encompassing assimilation and the adaptation of a perceived “civilized” lifestyle for Native Americans. The govern-mental officials believed the children’s separation from their families would reduce their families’ influence and further the assimilation process. Some Indian people managed to survive with little to no repercussions. For the majority of Indian people, the boarding school initiative made more of a negative impact than all other efforts to destroy the Indian people either intentionally or unintentionally, including armed forces, starvation, disease, loss of land, and Christianity.

            The outcome of this legislation was a vulnerable population laced with disease, death, poverty, and other social ills, such as rates of domestic violence, alcoholism, child abuse and neglect higher than any other sectors of the population. [i] Ongoing cultural oppression, health dis-parities and a lack of access to services and economic opportunity coupled with chronic poverty, have depleted hope for many tribal families. The cumulative effects of chronic stress and unresolved historical trauma have led to an increased risk of developing psychological and behavioral disorders.[ii] The negative impact of the enforced boarding school legislation is still resonating with many Native American families today. 

The concept of the boarding school initiative began in 1875 when Richard Henry Pratt was given responsibility of 72 Indian men charged with murder and rapine (the act of seizing property by force) at Fort Marion in St. Augustine, Florida. During their stay, these prisoners served as laborers to offset the cost of running the prison. They performed cleaning and maintenance duties. Pratt rehabilitated these men. They adopted the appearance and characteristics of the Euro-American population. These same Indian men were later placed in jobs without guards. Following Pratt’s efforts to rehabilitate the Indian men, the Carlisle Indian Boarding School was established by Pratt with support of the federal government in 1879. The boarding schools were fashioned after the same rehabilitative principles as the prison program, which included the school attendants serving as laborers to offset costs. [iii] 

Two boarding schools and one orphanage opened in Michigan. The Catholic Church opened the orphanage in Baraga in 1887, and Indian children were the primary occupants. The Holy Childhood Boarding School in Harbor Springs opened in 1889. The federal government opened the boarding school in Mt. Pleasant in 1893. Numerous other boarding schools opened in the United States and the Canadian government followed suit, modeling the residential schools after the American boarding schools. 

Boarding schools were run like military camps. Indian children were stringently taught how to follow orders. The children had to fall into formation, march in a straight line, and oftentimes wore military clothing and shoes. During the weekdays, the children attended school sessions. They were taught English, math, history, and geography, usually by Euro-American teachers. Some of the teachers tried to be kind and helpful, but many were cruel.

On average, only a few hours a day were spent in the classroom, and the other portion was spent undertaking assigned tasks. The children received minimal care and education. Students constituted the majority of the labor pool and did most of the meal preparation, building repairs, gardening, caring for livestock, and cleaning.         

Learning how to accomplish these tasks would help prepare them for adulthood in the white man’s world, because the only viable future was a white future. Girls were prepared to work as servants or to become home-makers. Boys were trained in the areas of gardening, repair and maintenance of homes and farms, the running of farms, printing presses, and the building of houses and furniture. Many of the children participated in an outing program in which they were placed in Euro-American homes and expected to do various chores for their room and board. They were forced to change the way they looked and forget their language, customs, and religion. Their loss of identity formed mixed messages about their heritage and about themselves, resulting in contempt for those in power as well as their parents and elders. 

It was a common practice to give the Indian children English names when they attended the boarding schools. In the Native American tribal way of life, one was not permitted to own anything that was provided to them by the Creator. The land, food and other necessities were bestowed to them to use and must be honored. The only thing that could be owned was their given names. Only one person in a village could have a specific name, and this name was derived by spiritual means such as visions, dreams and naming ceremonies. Names provided their identity throughout their lifetime. When English names were given to the children in the boarding schools as a part of the assimilation process and the loss of their given names led to identity confusion. 

Children who attended the boarding schools suffered from various types of abuse. Concerning sexual abuse, one woman reported she spent years in therapy until she finally grasped the fact she had been a victim. The shame and guilt she experienced as a result of the sexual abuse she was forced to endure at the hands of a priest at the Holy Childhood Boarding School caused her chronic emotional stress into adulthood.

Nuns would maintain relationships with young boys and these young boys would become confidants for these women. Mentally healthy women in their 30s or 40s do not fall in love with boys who are 10, 11 or 12 years of age.    Pedophiles work in a way that does not permit children to refuse. It is cunning, measured, and done under the pretext of fondness. These children were used as sexual outlets. Once the sexually deviant person tired of the current victim, they dumped them and preyed on other unsuspecting children. Victims often felt abandoned. Children could not escape from their perpetrators. They had no one to turn to and they were held captive because these institutions became their prison. [iv]

Another report involved nuns at the Holy Childhood Boarding School who began their seduction by kissing the younger boys good night. One of the abusive nuns was in her 20s, rather plain and chubby. The favored boys would get kissed on the lips and she would tickle them.  One of the people who attended the school stated that a few years went by for him until the kisses started getting longer and longer, and then he was taken to her bedroom. The boys were not expected to perform sexual acts until they were approximately 12 years of age.

One day, after aforementioned person was pulled off the playground and forced to perform sexual acts, he and a pedophile nun were caught in a compromising position by other nuns, yet the perpetrator did not receive any retribution.[v]  The children were habitually exposed to “institutionalized pedophilia” and “sexual terrorism.” The pedophiles included, but were not limited to, priests, nuns, and Protestant clergy.

The religious instruction that was provided added to the confusion and degradation of many Indian children. Oftentimes, they were abused in various ways by the very same people who were providing religious instruction. Children who demonstrated resistance to the teaching practices and the regimented authority were subjected to humiliation and harsh punishments. They suffered whippings and unusual torture such as standing on their tiptoes with arms outstretched while their hands were hit with wooden boards and rulers. The treatment of boys was typically more severe than that of girls. Ruthless punishment occurred when children tried to run away, although this did not deter many from attempting to do so.

Former students who attended the Holy Childhood Boarding School reported about some of the harsh treatments that occurred at that school. An excessive amount of emotional abuse was inflicted on these children. Jennifer was beaten with a rubber hose when she wet the bed or was forced to wear the urine-soaked sheets in front of her peers. Tim reported that he was called a “dirty savage” by staff at the Holy Childhood, which led to problems concerning the understanding of his own identity and as a result he struggled with self-esteem issues. Kent witnessed children at the Holy Childhood who were beaten if they spoke their native language. 

When the children first arrived at the school, they felt lonely and isolated and as a result many suffered from homesickness. Most children who attended these institutions were separated from their family before they were developmentally mature. The boarding schools were often one hour or further from the children’s homes. Before 1957, Indian children who lived in St. Ignace, Michigan had to be taken across Lake Huron on a barge and then transported by car to Harbor Springs, Michigan. The Mackinac Bridge was built in 1957, which eliminated the use of the barge system. The expense of travel was more than most Indian families could afford, which deterred them from visiting their children. In 1924, the Native American per capita annual income was approximately $81.[vi]

Prior to the 1920s, boarding school officials would have to seek preapproval from the local reservation superintendent or an Indian agent before permission could be granted for children to go home, even for severe hardship, such as deaths in the family and sick relatives.  Indian parents learned to get around these sanctions by stating that their children were needed to assist with farming. Since farming was a part of the assimilation process, it served as a more worthy excuse. When John Collier filled the position as Commissioner of Indian Affairs in 1933, these policies took a turn for the better.  Students were permitted to go home for the summer months and usually for family hardships.

Indian children developed alliances with each other and looked after one another while attending these institutions. Many of the children had never met Indian people from other tribes. They also practiced pan-Indianism, which involved the learning and adopting of portions of languages and cultures from other tribal communities. Friendships were often formed, some lasting their lifetimes. They made fun of the teachers and gave them names the students felt best suited their personalities.     On occasion, they snuck out at night together and did things they knew were forbidden activities, such as breaking into buildings on and off school property.  Sports, choirs, bands, and dances were other ways long lasting friendships were developed and ways in which the children maintained their sanity. Sharing the common experience of attending boarding schools was another way in which life long bonds were established.

When a child was sent to bed without a meal, the other children would often sneak them food. The children experienced what could be referred to as slow, agonizing starvation. School officials were allotted very limited funding, which served as a strong indication of the lack of importance concerning Indian children.

During the 1920s, the Meriam report revealed the lack of fresh food and milk for boarding school residents in the United States. This report involved an investigation concerning failed U.S. Indian policies in various areas such as education. The average per capita food allowance was 11 cents per day. As a result, students suffered from malnutrition because of the shortage of food. The Meriam report suggested 35 cents per day for each student. This would ensure proper nutrition and adequate food supply.           The recommendations put forth by those who conducted the Meriam study were often ignored. On another note, during the time the Meriam team was observing some of the boarding schools, they made notice of the extreme levels of quietness. Episodes of intermingling and comfortable conversations were non-existent. [vii]

Disease also ran rampant in the boarding schools with tuberculosis being one of the most serious. Measles, mumps, influenza, and trachoma, a disease that inflicted the eyes, were other health maladies. Often, the parents were not informed about their children’s illnesses. Children with these diseases and healthy students were kept together at the schools. Overcrowding was another issue. These schools were often filled to capacity and beyond. Due to the lack of medical services and poor diets, the children often died as a result of contracting diseases.

Neglect is another form of oppression in which a person is deprived of love, care, nurturance, support, or other pertinent assistance, as well as basic material needs such as food, shelter, and clothing. The children were provided shelter and clothing; however, their other needs were grossly neglected. They often experienced failure to thrive. As a result, many Indian people associated these institutions with death and despair. 

The boarding school experience did prepare children to communicate with the English-speaking popu-lation. A high percentage of the attendees had a difficult time returning to their home of origin. Their difficulty of fitting in with their families was partially due to the biased instruction they received at the school, as well as the lack of bonding with their families because of their long absences. Much of the native language was lost, along with many of the traditional customs. Many boarding school attendees did not return to the tribal communities.

A vast number of Indian children were released from the boarding schools when they were ready to attend high school. After spending years of following the stringent rules at the schools, they had to try and fit in with their families and the outside world. They were not taught how to think for themselves.

Teenagers are known to have difficulty making smart choices. During the late teens, the brain begins to develop its prefrontal cortex and inferior cortex, the areas that supervise judgment and self-control. This process is not completed until the mid-twenties. As a result, teenagers and young adults are subject to making bad judgments, lack inhibitory control, and experience a likelihood of developing addictive behaviors. These susceptibilities can be lessened if they receive caring support. 

Many of the teenagers who left these institutions were not welcomed by their families. The years of separation and the vast differences these attendees had with their families caused them to feel alienated and the needed support and guidance was nonexistent. A large number of Native American people are living with regrets that resulted from making poor choices when they were teenagers and young adults. Many Indian people married individuals who mirrored the caregivers at these institutions and ended up in loveless relationships and/or divorce. Again, the negative impact of these harsh environments resonates throughout tribal communities today.

Many of these students joined the white population and were acculturated into their way of life. They worked at jobs on farms or in towns. Some moved to the urban areas and others were hired by the boarding schools as teachers, cooks, and caretakers. Some of the students were grateful for learning trades taught at the schools. Jeff, a former student who attended the federal boarding school in Mt. Pleasant, Michigan, learned how to be barber while he was attending the school, which brought him money when he was in the armed service. He was hired by his peers to cut their hair while he served his country. The school gave him the confidence to tackle things such as his former job as a meteorologist, which was also a part of his career path.   Jeff still carried resentments towards his father for letting him down as a child, because his father had a drinking problem. Jeff felt his father was not a good provider. The family went without their basic needs being met such as food and adequate housing. His family was forced to move to the reservation and the housing was substandard. 

Jeff did not like the “outing program,” as he re-ferred to it. The outing program associated with the federal boarding school in Mt. Pleasant involved being forced to live with a family and work for them to earn his room and board after he left the school during his early teenage years. Jeff wanted to go to school instead of being forced to work. Jeff believed the school afforded better housing, regular meals, and future job opportunities.



[i] Child, B. (2000). Boarding School Seasons: American Indian Families, 1900-1940. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press, 43.
[ii] Reyhner, J. and Eder, J. (2004).  American Indian Education: A History.  Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 134-140.
[iii] Archuleta, M. Child, B., and Lomawaima, T. (2000).  Away from Home: American Boarding School Experiences 1897-2000.  Arizona: Heard Museum.
[iv] Stanton, A. (July 7, 2008).  Northern Express. Unholy Childhood. Retrieved on October 2, 2014 from http://www.northernexpress.com/editorial/features.asp?id=3240
[v] Churchill, W. (2004). Kill the Indian, Save the Man. California: City Lights Books, 62.
[vi] Child, B. (2000). Boarding School Seasons: American Indian Families, 1900-1940. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press, 45.
[vii] Ibid, 32.

Chapter X: Life on the Rez

Family Myths and Distortions


Family myths and distortions serve as a smoke screen in hopes of keeping others from knowing the reality of what is really going on in our lives. These myths and distortions are used to hide abuse and cover up specific information about relationships within the family. You’ve heard about the families in which the woman is chasing her husband in the front yard swinging a frying pan. Their problems are aired in public for the world to see.  However, that is not usually the case. There is a lot of shame associated with abuse. If we tell ourselves something enough times it be-comes reality. It is important to conduct a reality check.      We need to take off the rose colored glasses. I was attending conference and the key speaker was Claudia Black. The topic addressed at the conference concerned the plight of adult children of alcoholics. A person sitting next to me made reference to her childhood as being perfect. Claudia Black invited anyone who believes they had the perfect childhood to come to the front of the room and that belief would be challenged. There is no such thing as a per-fect childhood. We are imperfect beings raised by imperfect beings. Again, it is vital for us to view our past by utilizing an honest approach. 

To begin the process of seeing our families as it really was and is, take the view from an advantageous position of an outsider and how they would view our family. Many of us carried the belief that our parents were supposed to be kind and loving even if those perceptions were not real. We need to take off the rose colored glasses as mentioned earlier and realize we were born to parents who had to contend with their own baggage. Some of those bags were really heavy. 

We need to take the time to explore our lives and the lives of our families of origin. Here are some things to ponder:



·         Describe our families as if we were seeing our family from the perspective of someone else who lived in our community.

·         What is the true story of our families?

·         How did it feel to examine the true story about our families?

·         Why do we think we felt this way?

·         We need to consider who taught us these myths? Were we permitted to talk about the problems our family was facing?

·         What was the intention of this myth?  What was it meant to accomplish? 

Who or what was the myth and distortion suppose to protect?

·         How has this myth or distortion affected our lives?  We may pursue relationships that are destructive because we have not established a firm grasp of our family of origin.

·         Develop a positive outcome as a result of realizing the myths or distortions concerning our families. For example, our self-esteem has been more enhanced due to our journey of healing and as a result we are able to have a healthier relationships (Copeland and Harris, 2000).

 

There are so many families existing in a continuum of abuse while at least one of the parents is a pillar of the community. A lot of the priests, who were written about by Podles in Sacrilege: Sexual Abuse in the Catholic Church, were pillars in the community. Community members were aware of the honorable services they provided for the community and were not aware of their pedophile tendencies. There have been times noted of other prominent members of communities who were being abusive to their own children. In the public eye they are honored for their positions such as serving in roles of surgeons and clergy. Who is going to believe someone who is saying they have been abused by such an outstanding member of a com-munity?

Family myths and distortions are useful tools for hiding things we feel shame about from the rest of the world in an effort to conceal the ugly truth about our current and past relationships. Many of us have done so to try to fit in some place away from the abusive situation. Legislation is more readily enforced concerning child abuse, neglect and domestic violence. No one deserves, no matter what the circumstances are, to be abused and used in sick ways. It is important to conduct a reality check of our current and past experiences in order to heal from these circumstances.

From Victim to Thriver


An important goal when addressing historical trauma is to move from the victim role to thriving. The terms victim and survivor are often used interchangeably. There are vast differences between the terms. The terms victim, survivor, and thriver feature distinctions as follows:

Victim:

State of helplessness

Angry

Hoping to be rescued

Perception of lacking choices

Self-pity

Complacent

Identities self as a victim

In pain and feeling numb

Experiencing feelings of defeat

Avoidance of feelings

Controlled by traumatic memories

Controlled by depression, anxiety, hatred, bitterness, revenge, and physical complaints

Has not learned from the experience, likely to repeat trauma occurrences, and victimization

Feelings of shame and self-dislike

Self-destructive addictions



Survivor:

Beginning to feel stronger

Perception that there are resources and choices

Recognition of personal potential to change and grow

Living one day at a time; coping from day to day; present life is primary focus

Beginning to heal

Living moderately well

Suffering begins to lessen

Neutral about life; not depressed, but not happy

Realization of traumatic experience(s) existing in the past.

Removed ourselves from possible abusive situations



Thriver:



Committed to positive growth

Planning for the future with optimism

Active

Self-determined

Can experience joy

Established healthy self-esteem; and we see ourselves as valuable people

Reaching out to others

Have found meaning and purpose in life

Experience positive growth as a result of the trauma.

Can endure remaining anxiety based symptoms with relative comfort and/or acceptance

Guilty feelings have been resolved

Generally satisfied with life

Perception that we have moved beyond the trauma and have learned valuable lessons (Shiraldi, 2000).