Thursday, September 3, 2020

Trail of Tears

 

On May 28th in 1830 almost 190 years ago President Andrew Jackson signed the Senate Bill known as the Indian Removal Act. This act forced five Southeastern tribal nations which included Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole East of the Mississippi from their home lands along with additional tribes such as the Fox, Kickapoo, Lenape, Miami, Omaha, Ottawa, Potawatomi, Sauk, Shawnee and Wyandot. Smaller tribes were evicted from their homelands, also. The eviction from their home lands referred to as the “Trail of Tears,” a black eye for the history of the U.S., served as one of the most horrible acts of genocide in the history of Native Americans. The “Trail of Tears” is also referred to as an “Indian Holocaust.”  The government was looking for ways to take care of the “Indian problem” and procure the Indian people’s assets. Some of the officials viewed the assets held by the Cherokee and other tribes as a benefit to be sold and used as soon as they were sent on their way. Census figures revealed a significant amount of livestock, sawmills, blacksmith shops and so much more that were in the possession of the Cherokee people. The Cherokee tribal nation was a prosperous nation. Officials and white settlers could not wait to get their hands on their assets. A few believed it was in their best interest to vacate because their lives may be in danger.

The Cherokee resided on a vast amount of territory in Georgia, Alabama and Tennessee. Other tribal nations lived as far south as Florida. A new Indian territory in what is now Oklahoma awaited them after traveling on foot for thousands of miles. The Trail of Tears represented a long, difficult march for the Cherokee people. Many lost their lives due to cold weather, starvation and disease. Another end result of this heinous act was the disruption of their culture.

Dr. Howard Zinn, historian, in his ground breaking literary work “A People’s History of the United States 1492 – Present, referred President Jackson to “the most aggressive enemy of the Indians in early American History” (Coard, 2017, para. 3). He delineated the president’s actions involving the Indian Removal Act as “the most complete genocide in U.S. history” (Coard, 2017, para. 3).

 

            Congregationalists, an interdenominational missionary organization, were descendants of  the Puritans. They supported Indian rights and opposed slavery. This organization gained political influence. Their board consisted of business and political leaders which included congressmen. The financing of its missions, which encompassed much of the world, came from wealthy merchants, industrialists, church members and pastors. The board offered an opportunity to create an evolving United States, slow down the progress of New England ties, and create a more humane governmental structure. The group of Congregationalists viewed the Cherokee as having the ability to advance economically.

            President Madison faced different demands and Congress and the President were requested to solve the Indian problem by their constituents. The southern plantation owners voiced their desire to enhance their land ownership and provide land to their sons for plantations. Land-speculators such as Andrew Jackson, and governors and senators sought votes from the wealthy entrepreneurs. They applied a vast amount of pressure to be heard and have their requests honored. They believed the Indians could be civilized but did not want to wait for that to happen.

             In 1816, an attempt to bring the Cherokee up to speed, expedited by the Congregationalists’ American Board and partially funded by President Madison and the Secretary of War, William H. Crawford, a group of trained missionaries were sent to work with the Cherokee. The mission houses were paid for by the federal government.

            The missionaries received many complaints from the Cherokee parents about their children being terrified because of threats of eternal burning. Fire of this nature did not exist. Chief John Ross stepped in and served as an interpreter and translated the fears the Cherokee faced. John proposed the Cherokee sell their land to pay for the mission schools. He wanted the missionaries to succeed with their endeavor to change the Cherokee. He was a personable, friendly, and wealthy farm owner who had a slew of slaves under his command. A sizeable group of Cherokee people decided to migrate to the West. They went as far as Arkansas in 1817.

 

            Andrew Jackson started his campaign to move the Cherokee people westward in 1817. As a result of being appointed as a federal commissioner, he sent his agents from town to town to push his point of Indian removal. Bribery, utilized as their method of choice, provided a method of enticement to gain support from the Cherokee. He promised they would be granted the same amount of land west of the Mississippi that they currently resided on. Promises of a receipt of blankets, guns, brass kettles and beaver traps were made to the Cherokees who decided to migrate west. Jackson, called out on the fraudulent bribes, continued to seek support. He managed to receive a million acres rather than the two million acres he wanted to develop by his land agents who happened to be friends and business associates of his. He continued his efforts to move the Cherokee (Ehle, 1988).

 

            In 1830, the Indian Removal Act was pushed forward by Wilson Lumpkin, a young congressman from Georgia. He was motivated to save the Cherokee people and members of other tribes. He considered the situation as life or death for the native people. The bill involved the exchange of lands from where they resided in the east to lands in the west. Representative Lumpkin felt the bill represented his diligent work to save the Indian people. More than a million people signed petitions which went against the proposed bill but he referred to the petitioners as “Northern fanatics.” Lumpkin’s efforts supported President Jackson’s goals.

            He feared for the Indian people even though he thought they could be civilized. Lumpkin believed  the Cherokees undermined their futures by remaining in Georgia, his speech relayed his concerns. “They will every day be brought into closer contact and conflict with the  population, diminish the spirit of benevolence that white men felt toward the Indians, causing white citizens to withhold aid from these unfortunate people” (Inskeep, 2015, p. 230).

            Five southern Indian nations resided on a significant amount of land east of the Mississippi: the Choctas and Chickasaws lived by the great river, the Creeks and Cherokees stationed further east and the Seminoles in Florida. All lived in peace with their white neighbors. However, newspapers reported otherwise. A man from the Creek nation tried to flag down a stagecoach. A previous agreement was set forth by the Creek nation and their white neighbors that a toll would be paid. Instead of paying the toll they insulted the Creek man named Tuskina and reported him as being in a drunken state. Tuskina managed to get in front of the stagecoach again and he pulled out his small pocket knife. The driver and passengers, alarmed concerning Tuskina’s actions, waited for an hour and a half for him to calm down. Following the incident, rumors of an Indian attack spread like wildfire. A couple of groups of cavalry descended on the Creek nation and searched for Tuskina. Authorities moved to isolate the Creek nation and ordered any white man who was not married to an Indian woman to move away from the Creek settlement. Many people were surprised by the overreaction. A black mark scared the Creek reputation as a result of this discourse. The white settlers expected an Indian attack because they have been provoking them for years (Inskeep, 2015).

            A multitude of discussions were held in Washington during the spring of 1830 and the end result of these discussion was that it was not safe for the Indians to reside in the south. A discussion covered what the Indians wanted, did they want to move west or stay put? Some of the officials felt they should not be forced to move. Henry R. Storrs of New York spelled out the intent of the bill which was to clear Indians from southern real estate.

            The “Indian Removal Act” was being put to a vote. In the Senate, Jackson supporters rallied their strength. A few lawmakers took up the Indians’ cause. The House met a varied response to the bill. The seats were apportioned according to the population. The North experienced greater influence. Edward Everett, a young congressman, claimed the Indian Removal Act was going to be more expensive than its supporters asserted. A few southerners opposed the act. When the roll was called on May 26, David Crockett appealed to his loyalty to the Indian people by voting no. Jackson supporters stayed strong with their convictions. The Indian Removal Act was passed with 102 votes for and 97 against. The act cleared the House of Representatives.

            In 1817, Jackson paid tens of thousands of dollars for more than a million acres of Cherokee land and he took additional land and did not pay them any money. In 1830, the President raged about the Cherokees only holding out for money so he vowed to annihilate them. He changed his mind and decided to try to throw money at the problem again. He offered them 2.5 million dollars for the remaining Cherokee land and an additional ½ million if the Cherokee assumed the cost of travel to the west. The Cherokee gained a stronger hold in the area and as a result were being paid 50 cents an acre instead of the standard few cents. John Ross purported that the white settlers be paid to relocate instead of the Indian people. Jackson believed the majority of his constituents supported him and Ross believed the majority of his people, the Cherokee nation, supported him. However, some of the members of the Cherokee nation believed Ross was deluded and he was leading them toward disaster. In 1833, the offer of 2.5 million dollars was back on the table. By 1835, the leaders of the Treaty Party gathered in New Echota to discuss negotiations.

A $5 million settlement for their land was refused. The Treaty Party and the federal government sought to persuade everyone that their act of negotiation represented what the Cherokee people wanted. Public attendance at the public conference to discuss negotiations was dismally small. John Ross met with the administration in Washington and as soon as they learned about the Treaty Party meeting in New Echota they stopped talks with Ross. A two-thirds majority was required to pass the treaty, if the Cherokees were united. They were not. The treaty prevailed by a single vote. The majority, the Washington administration, ruled.

Some of the Cherokee did not wait until the deadline of May 1838 to vacate their lands.  Four hundred sixty-six people, half of them children boarded a dozen flatboats that parked on the Tennessee River. They departed the Cherokee Nation on March 3, 1837. Emigrants traveled by land also. On October 13, 1837 emigrants traveled by wagon when they departed the Cherokee Nation. Sickness prevailed for some of the travelers of all ages and they lost their lives during this journey (Inskeep, 2015).

Cherokee women were seen planting corn for a fall harvest. That enraged the white settlers. It appeared that the Cherokee people did not plan on vacating the land. The news of the planting got back to Washington. The white settlers put their foot down and said a wandering Indian did not own the land they hunted on. They must improve the land by adding a house, fencing and they had to farm the land. Things were getting heated and something had to be done about the unwanted squatters.  Most of the Cherokee were not squatters. They were settled on large plots of land, crowing corn and raising livestock. A few wanderers were used as an example of how the Cherokee nation as a whole was not living in a manner conducive to what was expected of them by the white settlers.

July of 1838, General Scott being awarded the responsibility of the removal of the remainder of the Cherokee people, worked diligently to remove 11,000 Cherokee people who were still living in the East. Many troops and volunteers, enlisted to aid in the venture, came from many backgrounds. Scott was concerned about the Georgians because they appeared to make it their goal to kill Indians. He did not want that for the Cherokees. He wanted a peaceful transition for them.

The Cherokee Nation was divided into 13 groups, each of them more or less than a thousand. The first detachment was to leave September 1st and the last one was to depart by December 5th. The soldiers cleared one farm at a time. They approached a house, surround the house so no one could escape, then the Cherokee were ordered to leave the premises with no more than they could carry (Inskeep, 2015).

Rebecca Neugin was three years old when she was ordered to leave her family home with her eight siblings and her two parents. “When the soldier came to our house my father wanted to fight,” she said.

“but my mother told him that the soldiers would kill him if he did and we surrendered without a fight. They drove us out of our house to join other prisoners in a stockade. After they took us away, my mother begged them to let her go back an get some bedding. So, they let her go back and she brought what bedding and cooking utensils she could carry and had to leave behind all of our household possessions.” (Inskeep, 2015, pg. 323)

 

            The Cherokee were held in detention camps which according to reports sounded more favorable by people who did not have to stay in them. General Scott referred to some of the camps he was in charge of as well shaded and large, approximately 12 miles by four miles with a river border. He said the plots served as a sulking ground for unhappy Cherokee people. Scott did confess that the Cherokee people, who resided in these camps, did not have possession of their cooking utensils, clothes and other goods that would have made their lives easier. “Evan Jones, a missionary who lived with the Cherokees, described them as prisoners who had instantly been hurled from comfortable circumstances into abject poverty. Captain Webster, a Tennessee volunteer, was overcome with feeling of foreboding as his company guarded the prisoners. He wrote a letter to his wife to say there were seven or eight thousand Cherokees in various camps around his company, and they are the most quiet people you ever saw. The only consistent sound was that of preachers, white and Cherokee, who went among prisoners and soldiers alike trying to save souls. ‘Among these sublime mountains and in the dark forests with the thunder often sounding in the distance, the talk of God only made him wonder what would fall upon my guilty head as one of the instruments of oppression” (Inskeep, 2015, pg. 325-326). Their quietness can be equated to a time of surrender and loss of hope.

            In May 1838, the Cherokee forced march began accompanied by U.S. Army troops, along with various state militia and volunteers. History, written by the victors, made it difficult to come up with an exact number of how many Cherokees were evicted from their homelands. The count could be as high as 100,000 that suffered the tortuous conditions and as many as 30 percent of them lost their lives as a result of shootings, beatings, starvation, dysentery, whooping cough, cholera in the summer, and pneumonia in the winter along with exposure to harsh weather conditions. Some traveled by boat but most traveled on foot. Covered wagons carried supplies and some of the elders were permitted to ride on the wagons. However, when the terrain became rough, they would have to walk alongside. To escape slavery, some of the tribal members of the various tribes were black people who were adopted into the tribes. President was known to possess a hatred of all people of color. He considered them to be subhuman. The impact of the “Trail of Tears” was devastating from loss of lives to a loss of culture. The relocation was completed by the end of March in 1839. The Cherokee struggled to acclimate themselves into an unfamiliar land. (Coard, 2017).

           

 

No comments:

Post a Comment